OGK-2 JSC plans its priority development directions within the framework of the general Strategy of Gazprom PJSC in the electric power industry for the next ten-year period (until 2027), including increasing customer focus and maintaining import substitution policy.
OGK-2 Mission | We consider ourselves to be the largest heat power Company and have a significant economic impact on society. |
We are a reliable partner in the energy markets, we build long-term and mutually beneficial cooperation. | |
We use scientific and technical developments to introduce new technologies in energy production for the home, business and the country. | |
We develop the professional and creative potential of the staff, combining our efforts and talents to ensure the Company’s leading positions in the market. | |
We care about the interests of shareholders, increasing the profitability and capitalization of the Company. | |
We provide the highest standards of environmental protection, minimize negative impact on the environment. | |
We strive to ensure the long-term growth of our business, transform OGK-2 into a leading power company. |
OGK-2 development priorities are determined by the need to increase the efficiency of the Company in order to increase business value. Improving the efficiency of the Company should be aimed at the formation of its economic potential, providing the ability to update generating capacities.
Taking into account the strategic goal, the characteristics of the Company, the market situation and risks, the main directions of development of OGK-2 are formed with an emphasis on improving profitability, efficiency and competitiveness. Strategic development priorities are identified in four main areas:
To implement these tasks, a system of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) has been established that sets specific goals and motivates the management of the Company to achieve them.
Based on the work of the OGK-2 risk management system, the monitoring of possible negative impacts on the implementation of the Company’s development priorities is carried out with further adjustment of tasks and KPIs.
In the reporting year, there were no changes in strategic development priorities.
The use of the KPI system in OGK-2 improves the performance of governing bodies and gives the company an objective basis for a regular bonus system.
The list, methods of calculation and performance assessment, as well as target KPIs for 2020 were approved by OGK-2 JSC Order No. 292 dated November 10, 2020.
The KPI matrix for 2020 features 15 quarterly and 32 annual indicators in the following areas:
The decomposition of indicators by the Company’s employees is based on the KPIs of the Company’s top managers. The indicators are cascaded down to the level of branch managers, executives and branch employees, with a focus on the achievement of structural divisions’ objectives, as well as individual goals and objectives.
Notes:
This List establishes the composition of the KPIs and the weights of indicators of the Company's Senior Managers. If the weights of indicator groups indicated in the List differ from those approved by other documents of the Company, the values from the List shall take precedence.
1) If there is no position of the Senior Manager in the organizational structure and/or in the staffing table of the Company, the Managing Director of the Company determines the list of employees (Line Director, Head of a Structural Unit, etc.) responsible for achievement of the relevant operational KPIs (KPI of a functional unit) and the weights of indicators (the relative amount of bonus paid for achieving the indicator). The aggregate weight of these indicators in the total (nominal) amount of bonuses paid to relevant employees shall be at least 50% per quarter, year.
2) If the zeroing KPI is not met, no bonus is paid for achieving strategic annual KPIs.
3) Evaluation of performance of the Managing Director for the "Annual Operational KPIs", "Quarterly KPIs" group is calculated as the average assessment of KPI achievement by the rest of the Senior Managers (functional units).
4) The "Turnover of Heat Energy Trade Receivables" indicator is given for reference purposes, the assessment of its achievement does not affect the amount of employee bonuses.
The Company implemented the OGK-2 JSC Action Plan to increase operating efficiency and optimize costs for 2020. The 2021 Action Plan of OGK-2 to increase operating efficiency and optimize costs was compiled based on the principles defined in 2020.
The Action Plan to increase operational efficiency and optimize costs of OGK-2 is aimed at fulfilling the Company’s potential in the main type of activity and is formed in the following sections:
Following the results of 2020, the effect of the implementation of the Plan approved by the Board of Directors of OGK-2 amounted to 435.9 million rubles.
2019 | 2020 | 2021 | |||
Plan | Actual | Plan | Actual | Plan | |
Actual economic effect of the Action Plan to increase operating efficiency and optimize costs, million rubles | 233.6 | 235.0 | 260.0 | 435.9 | 130.4 |
In order to monitor the implementation of the Action Plan for increasing operating efficiency, a system for monitoring the implementation of measures has been developed, incentive and incentive mechanisms have been introduced. Work is underway to replicate best practices.
The priority area of activity in 2021 is the further development of the Action Plan to increase the Company’s operational efficiency, one of the main directions of which is to increase the efficiency of work on equipment maintenance, reduce under-supply of power and improve the technical and economic indicators of operation of power units.
In 2019, the Company developed and implemented an energy management system in accordance with the requirements of the ISO 50001:2018 standard.
In accordance with the policy of energy conservation and energy efficiency, the priorities of OGK-2 JSC in the field of energy conservation have been identified:
The purpose of the Company in the field of energy conservation and energy efficiency is to achieve planned savings in fuel and energy resources by branches and the Company in kind and in money terms for the period, subject to economic feasibility.
A certification audit conducted by an independent expert organization confirmed the compliance of the functioning system with the requirements of the standard ISO 50001:2018. The certificate of conformity was obtained in March 2020.
In the second half of 2019, the Company began the development and implementation of a Quality Management System in accordance with the requirements of ISO 9001:2015 and STO Gazprom 9001-2018.
The development of the system is based on mutual support of mutual coordination, unification of the quality management system of Gazprom Energoholding LLC and OGK-2 JSC due to their harmonization at the level of quality policy and goals, as well as through the implementation of a unified approach to the formation of the process model of the system management to ensure uniformity of business architecture of the management system of OGK-2 JSC with Gazprom Group companies.
The main objectives of OGK-2 investment activities are to increase the capacity of power plants with high reliability, cost-effectiveness and overall performance, replace existing main generating equipment with new high-performance equipment, complete construction of new facilities under the CSA and introduce modern technologies.
In 2020, the actual financing of capital investment amounted to 9,437.8 million rubles. The actual financing of capital investment within the framework of the technical re-equipment and reconstruction program in 2020 amounted to 8,470.4 million rubles, which is 43.8% higher than in 2019.
Projects | Benefits achieved | |
Kirishskaya GRES | ||
Modernization of automated process control systems for boilers of the CCPP (К-3Т, К-5Т) | Expansion of the software and hardware complex functions to a full-scale automated process control system of the boiler. Increasing the operational readiness and maneuverability of the equipment. | |
Technical re-equipment of KhVO-1 with the introduction of an automated process control system | Increasing the accuracy of the regulation of parameters determining the operation of equipment and the quality of the technological process of water treatment, minimizing the occurrence of emergency situations. | |
Installing current-limiting reactors on 330 kV open-type switchgear | Ensuring reliable and safe operation of 330 kV open-type switchgear equipment. | |
Surgutskaya GRES-1 | ||
Technical re-equipment of instrumentation and automation of power unit No. 10 with the introduction of automated process control systems | Automated control of the entire technological process of electric power generation of a given quantity and quality has been implemented. Increasing the operational readiness and maneuverability of the power unit. | |
Technical re-equipment of HPH Nos. 5, 6, 7 of turbine unit under st. No. 3 with replacement of pipe systems | Improving the technical and economic performances of the main equipment. | |
Novocherkasskaya GRES | ||
As part of the ash dump reconstruction, the dam of section No. 4 was built-up from 16 meters to 21 meters | The usable volume of section No. 4 was increased to 3 mln m3. |
The main objective of the Company is to maintain the basic production assets in good operational condition at optimal costs for repairs and maintenance of equipment, buildings and structures.
In 2020, in order to ensure the required reliability of energy supply in accordance with the annual schedule of repair of the main equipment, overhaul and medium repairs were carried out on 11 turbines with a total capacity of 3,423 MW and 14 boilers with a steam capacity of 11,700 t/h, as well as extended current repairs were performed. In addition, the repairs commenced in 2019 were completed:
The most effective and technically sophisticated new generation facilities are given increased attention both during operation and in the organization of the maintenance service.
The Company has developed a set of measures aimed at timely service, taking preventive measures to reduce the risk of emergency situations and improving the reliability of equipment.
In order to ensure the power supply reliability, trouble-free and economical operation of the equipment, minor inspections of gas turbines of the modern power units of two CCGTs-180 of Adlerskaya TPP, CCGT-450 of Cherepovetskaya GRES, CCGT-450 of Serovskaya GRES, a sophisticated main inspection (MI) of the gas turbine of GTU-11 of Adlerskaya TPP were performed in 2020.
The service maintenance of the power unit of STU-330 of Novocherkasskaya GRES with a unique and single boiler in Russia with a circulating fluidized bed (CFB) and the power unit of STU-660 of Troitskaya GRES constructed based on imported elements, was performed by designated companies.
Furthermore, in 2020, works were commenced on main inspections of GTU-22 at Adlerskaya TPP, GTU-62, GTU-63 of CCGT-800 unit at Kirishskaya GRES, scheduled to be completed in February 2021.
Power industry is an industry in which modern technologies are actively applied. To maintain competitiveness, OGK-2, like other large electricity companies, conducts research and development in the field of increasing production efficiency and introducing innovative technology.
A significant role in this process is performed by scientific and technical and experimental design work (R&D).
One of the projects completed in 2020 was carried out by Serovskaya GRES, a branch of OGK-2 JSC – this was cleaning-in-place of the heat exchange surfaces of plate heat exchangers.
An innovation project for developing technology and piloting production of thermal barrier tiles for gas turbines has shifted to 2021.
In 2020, the implementation of an electronic document management information system (hereinafter, EDMS) started in the Executive Office and branches of the Company. In accordance with directives of the Government of the Russian Federation and orders of Gazprom PJSC, aimed at import substitution of software, the EDMS is implemented on the basis of the Sputnik ECM platform, which has been developed by the Russian company KORUS Consulting DM and registered in the Register of Russian Software under No. 3486 on May 03, 2017.
The transition to the EDMS Sputnik ECM will help the Company achieve the following objectives:
The implementation of this project will strengthen the position of the Company’s IT solutions in terms of:
In 2020, the server infrastructure was upgraded at OGK-2 JSC branches – Pskovskaya GRES, Kirishskaya GRES, Novocherkasskaya GRES and Adlerskaya TPP. This upgrade enabled the transformation of the current computing infrastructure into a high-tech hardware platform designed to improve fault-tolerance of services, and to effectively address current and future challenges, and it will significantly improve the reliability of the Company’s operations.
Plans for 2021:
The Company’s risk management and internal control system (hereinafter, the RM&ICS) is based on the recommendations of international professional organizations, international and Russian standards, Gazprom Group methodological documents on risk management and internal control, as well as on the recommendations of the Bank of Russia on organizing risk management, internal control, internal audit, the work of the Audit Committee under the Board of Directors at public joint stock companies, and the principles of the Corporate Governance Code.
Recognizing that the implementation of activities is subject to uncertainties in the form of risks, OGK-2 JSC takes risk management measures in order to provide sufficient guarantees to achieve the goals set for the Company. The Company has developed and approved by a decision of the Board of Directors (Minutes No. 223 dated September 30, 2019) and has a Risk Management and Internal Control Policy that defines the goals, objectives and components of the risk management and internal control system, the principles of its functioning, as well as the functions of participants in the risk management and internal control system.
Main participants in the RM&ICS:
The Company’s Risk Management and Internal Control Policy applies to the structural units of the Company (including branches), its subsidiaries and organizations.
The risk management and internal control policy defines the following objectives:
The organization of the risk management system implements the following basic principles:
Risk management and internal control activities provide for the continuous operation of system components.
In accordance with the organizational structure of the Executive Office of OGK-2 JSC, approved by decision of the Board of Directors (Minutes dated December 17, 2019), a Risk Management and Internal Control Department has been in place at the Company since March 1, 2020. The Department is responsible for solving tasks and performing functions within the process of risk management and internal control, methodological support for implementing the Company’s risk management and internal control policy, and interaction with structural divisions of the Company. The structural divisions – owners of the Company’s risks carry out risk identification, risk assessment, development and implementation of risk management measures, monitoring of risks and measures.
In 2020, as part of the development of the risk management and internal control system, the Company carried out the following activities:
Reporting on the Risk Management and Internal Control System was prepared and approved following the results of 2020.
Risk type | Risk description | Management / impact on risk |
1. Branch risks | ||
1.1. Risk of the Company’s reduced marginal profit from electricity sales | As a result of decreased demand on the electricity market and increased competition on the electricity market, there is a risk of reduced electricity sales, resulting in lower marginal profit. | Decommissioning of equipment whose operation is not economically feasible. Using of the most suitable trading strategies in the wholesale electricity and capacity market. |
1.2 Production and technical risks | ||
1.2.1 Risk of untimely repair works. | Failure to commission equipment in a timely manner as a result of untimely repair works. | Ensuring timely conclusion of repair contracts, quality planning of repair works at all branches. Ensuring continuous monitoring by branches of the repair works, compiling schedules for each overhaul. Ensuring control over the supply of equipment (materials). |
1.2.2. Risk of failure to meet the deadlines for commissioning of facilities from technical re-equipment and reconstruction | Modernization of a generating facility, modernization of technical security equipment, construction of a start-up and heating boiler plant for the power unit needs, technical re-equipment of instrumentation and automation, technical re-equipment of a booster compression plant, boiler unit, turbine unit under st. No. 3, reconstruction of a chimney, technical re-equipment of high-pressure heaters Nos. 5, 6, 7 of turbine unit under st. No. 3, with replacement of piping systems. | Including measures for penalties in the terms and conditions of the work contract in case of failure to comply with the schedule of work performed. Enforcing deadlines for a comprehensive schedule of key events. |
1.2.3. Risks of technological breakdowns and accidents | Emergency shutdowns of main and auxiliary equipment due to violations of equipment operating rules by employees. | Quality training of employees under individual programs before they are allowed to work independently. Optimization of operation mode: work/rest. |
1.2.4. Risk of rise in project costs and failure to meet the Company’s needs in works, goods and contractual services | Overstatement of the cost of works and services calculated as per labor costs at the stage of formation of the initial (maximum) purchase price. | Further study of the market conditions of procurement item. Use of all available sources of information in order to collect data in determining the initial (maximum) prices. Performance of work and provision of services based on the results of competitive procedures. Further training in the field of pricing for the employees of the initiator (unit) of procurement of work and services |
1.3. Regulatory risks | ||
1.3.1. Risk of deterioration of the Company’s performance indicators as a result of the adoption/amendment of regulatory legal acts governing the activities of electric power industry entities, including the rules of the wholesale electricity market, regulatory acts in the field of heat supply | Changes in legislation in the field of electricity and heat supply and other related energy sectors significantly affect the company’s activities because: | Preparation and direction of positions, risks affecting the industry. Regular monitoring and discussion of changes in the regulatory legal acts. Conducting model calculations. |
2. Legal risks | ||
2.1. Risk of performance of a judicial act giving rise to obligations for the Company | Failure to satisfy claims and demands made by/against the Company (debt collection, compensation for damages, protection of property rights). | Participation in training seminars, round tables, forums. Regular internal meetings and meetings with legal departments of the branches on changes in the legislation and judicial practice. |
2.2. Risk of liability to pay penalties and/or damages under the Framework Agreement due to a breach of the terms and conditions of the Framework Agreement | Risk of non-compliance with the terms and conditions of the sales agreement for Krasnoyarskaya GRES-2 property dated December 31, 2019. Settlement of personnel management issues. | Imposing restrictions on the transfer of employees to other branches of the Company and to organizations within the Gazprom Energoholding Group. |
2.3 Regulatory risks | ||
2.3.1. Risk of claims/sanctions from tax authorities | Risk of additional accrual of property tax. | Judicial settlement measures, in case of disagreement, after receipt of opinion based on on-site tax audit. |
2.3.2. The risk of sanctions by regulatory authorities for violations of environmental law | Violations of environmental law identified by the state environmental supervision bodies that were not eliminated within the prescribed period through the fault of the risk owner. | Monitoring of compliance with the terms for the implementation of measures aimed at the elimination of environmental law violations. |
3. Financial risks | ||
3.1. Credit risk/Deterioration of payment capacity of electricity and heat consumers | Increase in overdue receivables due to untimely fulfilment of payment obligations under sales and purchase contracts in the wholesale electricity and capacity market and withdrawal of counterparties’ status of a wholesale electricity and capacity market entity. Increase in overdue accounts receivable for heat and heat-transfer medium due to untimely or incomplete fulfillment of financial obligations by the counterparties. | Monitoring of counterparties in the wholesale electricity and capacity market. Monitoring of timely fulfillment of obligations by counterparties by the key date of payment. Conclusion of contracts with determination of payment terms and settlement procedure. Awareness-raising work among consumer related to the need of payments with a description of the liability for delays in accordance with the norms of the current legislation. Conducting claim-related work. Involvement of Administration in the regions of presence. Entering into an agreement for assignment of right (demand) for a debt. Applying heat supply restriction measures for certain categories of consumers, with resumption after full payment of arrears. |
3.2. Currency risk | Risk of adverse changes in the fair value of liabilities denominated in foreign currencies under the influence of changes in exchange rates, as well as risk of changes in expenses denominated in foreign currencies under the influence of exchange rates. | Monitoring of the exchange rate and, if necessary: - conclusion of hedging transactions using derivative financial instruments on the basis of current agreements on futures transactions in financial markets (RISDA). Providing a regular (on a quarterly basis) assessment of the currency risk of the Company, generating reports on the exposure of the Company to currency risk for the management of the Company and other users of information. In case of high exposure of the Company to currency risk – change of the agreed (contractual) conditions, including the introduction of currency clauses in the Company’s contracts, amendment of the terms of payment under such contracts. |
3.3. Risks of non-performance of contracts (by the municipality/administration of the city) | Refusal to receive compensation under the Agreement between the City District Administration and OGK-22 Serovskaya GRES. | Development of mechanisms and grounds for receiving compensation. |
4. Risks associated with the Company’s activities | ||
4.1. Environmental risks | Changing the hazard class of ash and slag waste. | Controlling the fuel quality characteristics. |
4.2. Risk of failure to submit price bids due to malfunction of IT systems | In case of IT system malfunctions related to the work of desktop computers, software installed on them and digital signature keys, there are risks of not being able to submit (adjust) price bids in the market. | Providing additional independent laptops having long battery life and capable of connecting to unlimited high-speed Internet in the event of a failure of IT systems and software applications in the company’s office. |
4.3. Risk of failure to meet staffing needs due to the proliferation of a new coronavirus infection | Risk of staff shortages for ensuring the stable functioning of the Company due to increased staff sickness rates, isolation of employees and transfer to a remote working mode (as part of measures to counter the proliferation of a new coronavirus infection). | Organization of training for standby shift personnel. Additional labor costs for personnel engaged in the operational management and maintenance of electrical installations. Conducting 100% thermometric checks when attending the workplace. Organizing regular testing of personnel. Informing personnel about prevention and epidemiological measures. Changing personnel working hours. Organizing and supervising the remote working of personnel. Organizing additional service vehicle routes for the delivery of personnel. Conducting disinfection in the premises. |
4.4. Asset loss risk | Committing an act of unlawful interference at a generating facility. | Provision and maintenance of sufficient level of physical protection at the facility (provision of the complex of technical security equipment at the facility, maintaining its operability; ensuring physical security of the facility; provision of safety regimes at the facility). |
4.5. Degradation of business reputation | Deterioration of the Company’s corporate image. | Conducting kick-off meetings on the need for harmonization of information materials. |
The risk management and internal control system of OGK-2 includes, among other things, identification, monitoring and management of risks related to sustainable development.
The identified risks include environmental, social, reputational and other sustainability risks.
The impact of climate change, biodiversity and information security risks on the Company’s activities is assessed as minimal.
The description of the risks is available in the Report on Sustainable Development of production companies of the Gazprom Energoholding Group: https://www.ogk2.ru/rus/about/social/.
We build relationships with all our suppliers, regardless of their share in the supply structure, on the principles of responsible partnership. We strive to maintain long-term, stable, mutually beneficial relationships with suppliers. OGK-2 is constantly working to improve the stability of supply, as well as transparency of pricing. We select suppliers and contractors mainly on a competitive basis and strive to work with contractors who have an impeccable reputation, comply with the law, as well as corporate and business ethics.
The goals of the OGK-2 procurement system are the cost-effective spending of financial resources, timely and complete satisfaction of the needs for goods, work, services, taking into account the safety of hazardous production facilities, as well as the implementation of measures aimed at reducing the Company’s costs, improving the order and increasing the efficiency of procurement.
The main document determining the procurement policy of the Company is the Regulations on the procurement of goods, works and services. This document defines a unified methodological basis for ensuring efficient procurement procedures conducted mainly on a competitive basis.
Basic principles of procurement:
The Company Procurement System includes:
All procurements organized on a competitive basis in 2020 were carried out in electronic form on the websites of the National Electronic Platform (www.etp-ets.ru), the Automated Trading System “Sberbank-AST” (www.sberbank-ast.ru) and the Trading System “GazNeftetorg.ru” (www.gazneftetorg.ru). Based on the results of organizing competitive procurement procedures in 2020, a positive effect was achieved in the amount of 5.5% of the initial (maximum) price of competitive procurements (excluding fuel purchases).
In 2020, OGK-2 complied with the requirements of Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated December 11, 2014 No. 1352 with respect to the annual volume of contracts concluded as a result of procurement, of which only small and medium-sized enterprises are participants. In 2020, the volume of contracts concluded on such purchases amounted to 25.2% of the total annual volume of contracts concluded by OGK-2 based on the results of all purchases, with the established regulatory value of 18%.
Cash flow from the sale of unclaimed material and technical resources and recyclable waste in 2020 amounted to 71.7 million rubles without VAT.
The main resource procured by OGK-2 for the production of electric and thermal energy is fuel. In accordance with the reporting data prepared according to RAS standards, fuel costs also prevail in the structure of the variable costs of the Company:
Type of fuel | The cost of spent fuel, million rubles | Share of fuel costs in variable costs according to RAS, % | ||||||
2018 | 2019 | 2020 | Change 2020/2019, % | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | ||
Gas | 48,857 | 46,362 | 39,907 | -13.9% | 64.80% | 68.25% | +68.65% | |
Coal | 13,210 | 12,131 | 10,865 | -10.4% | 17.51% | 17.86% | +18.69% | |
Fuel Oil | 342 | 214 | 153 | -28.5% | 0.28% | 0.31% | +0.26% | |
Diesel fuel | 6 | 25 | 3 | -88.0% | 0.01% | 0.04% | +0.01% | |
Total | 62,415 | 58,731 | 50,928 | -13.3% | 77.91% | 86.46% | +68.65% |
In 2020, fuel costs amounted to 50,928 million rubles, which is 13.3% lower than in 2019.
In 2020, the cost of gas consumed decreased by 13.9% compared to 2019.
The largest decrease occurred at Kirishskaya GRES (-3,962 million rubles), Surgutskaya GRES-1 (-1,819 million rubles) and Stavropolskaya GRES (-1,265 million rubles). Gas costs have also decreased at Cherepovetskaya GRES (-496 million rubles), Novocherkasskaya GRES
(-308 million rubles), Pskovskaya GRES (-68 million rubles) and Ryazanskaya GRES (-60 million rubles). The main reason for the decrease was a change in generation due to the current pattern and mode situation in the UES of Russia. Meanwhile, the remaining branches saw an increase in gas costs of 1,523 million rubles compared to 2019, influenced by higher output and higher gas prices.
In 2020, the cost of coal consumed decreased by 10.4% compared to 2019.
The largest decrease of coal costs occurred at Krasnoyarskaya GRES-2 (-1,333 million rubles) due to the change of the pattern and mode situation in the Siberian UPS and the transfer of operational control of Krasnoyarskaya GRES-2 to the Siberian Generating Company from October 01, 2020; at Troitskaya GRES (-448 million rubles) due to the change of the pattern and mode situation in the Ural UPS; at Serovskaya GRES (-5 million rubles) due to the decommissioning of coal generation. At the same time, there was an increase in coal costs at individual branches: Novocherkasskaya GRES (+320 million rubles) due to the increase in coal prices; Cherepovetskaya GRES (+164 million rubles) due to the decommissioning of coal generation at Cherepovetskaya GRES from January 01, 2021, the SNLT was reduced for the branch and coal was combusted; Ryazanskaya GRES (+36 million rubles) due to the increase in coal prices.
The cost of fuel oil consumed decreased by 28.4% in 2020. The main reason was a decline in output at Krasnoyarskaya GRES-2 and Troitskaya GRES.
The decrease in diesel fuel costs by 89.8% is due to the pre-commissioning works involving combustion of diesel fuel at Groznenskaya TPP, a branch of OGK-2 JSC to be commissioned in 2019.
The strategy of OGK-2 JSC in the field of fuel supply is aimed at optimizing the fuel balance in order to minimize costs. It provides for the maximum possible replacement of expensive fuel with other types of fuel, the purchase of fuel through competitive procedures, the conclusion of long-term contracts for the supply of fuel.
The Company’s capacities are dispersed across 12 regions of Russia. In this regard, OGK-2 JSC actively cooperates with regional coal suppliers and optimizes fuel costs through the use of gas and various types of coal by power plants. Coal from the Kansk-Achinsk, near-Moscow, Borodino, Pereyaslov, Rostov and Ekibastuz open casts is supplied to the branches of OGK-2 JSC mainly under long-term supply contracts.
The supply chain of OGK-2 JSC reflects the most significant suppliers and their share in the Company’s expenses for the purchase of the main types of raw materials used – gas, coal, fuel oil and diesel fuel. When selecting the most significant suppliers, we were guided by the principle of materiality – the scheme shows suppliers whose share is more than 10% in the total cost of deliveries of this type of raw material for 2020.
Supplier | Share in the total gas supply cost, % | ||
2018 | 2019 | 2020 | |
Gazprom mezhregiongaz St. Petersburg LLC | 17% | 23% | 17% |
Gazprom mezhregiongaz Rostov-on-Don LLC | 10% | less than 10% | 10% |
Surgutneftegaz PJSC | 24% | 26% | 27% |
Gazprom mezhregiongaz Stavropol LLC | 25% | 16% | 16% |
Supplier | Share in the total coal supply cost, % | ||
2018 | 2019 | 2020 | |
Russian Coal JSC | 16% | 19% | 20% |
Gaz-Alyans LLC | 37% | 34% | less than 5% |
Yuzhnaya Toplivnaya Kompaniya LLC | 10% | 15% | 23% |
FLASH ENERGY LLC | less than 2% | less than 5% | 28% |
Factors of changes in the distribution of shares between the main coal suppliers in 2020 compared to 2019:
Supplier | Share in the total cost of fuel oil and diesel fuel supplies, % | ||
2018 | 2019 | 2020 | |
Nova Group LLC | 29% | less than 10% | - |
Krasnoyarskaya Toplivnaya Kompaniya LLC | 15% | less than 10% | - |
GC EKS JSC | 26% | 19% | - |
Mobitek LLC | - | 32% | 15% |
Aftiag-Oil LLC | - | - | 53% |